Tag: planetary consciousness

What Makes Life Precious or Miraculous

In the discussions of abortion, one often hears about the preciousness of life and that childbirth is a miracle or life is a miracle. “Precious” and “miracle” are fuzzy terms that need to be explored to understand how people can see things differently. This article does not explore how to respect preciousness or miraculousness, which would get us into a discussion of pro-birth vs. pro-life and pro-choice.

Preciousness

“Precious” means different but related things.

From a strictly biological, natural mechanical perspective, we’re just a bunch of elements found in abundance throughout the universe — which is huge — that have combined in a way that allows life to emerge. That building blocks converge to “create” something is not a radical idea. However, the convergence of the right building blocks in the right amounts in the right conditions might be considered a rare event, and life, then, a rare result.

Continue reading “What Makes Life Precious or Miraculous”

An argument for a living, conscious planet

》TOC 》
  1. What Does it Mean to Say That the Earth is Alive?
  2. Emergent fabric of life
  3. Challenging traditional measures
  4. What is Emergent Consciousness?
  5. The relationship between life and consciousness on earth
  6. Conclusion

This article is a follow-up to Planetary Consciousness. And note: my time writing documents while working at AWS has altered my approach to writing. It’s a little drier and matter-of-fact. I’ll try to regress with time, hoping that my writing DNA has not mutated.

The concept that the earth is alive is an idea that has been debated by philosophers, scientists, and spiritualists for centuries. Some argue that the earth is not only alive but that it also has a consciousness, much like a living organism, with a level of awareness, sentience, and perception beyond its physical components.

Then there are those who argue the opposite. It is hard for us humans to think of consciousness apart from the nervous system of a living organism.  It’s like proximity bias, where we give greater weight or importance to things that are closer or more familiar to us; or confirmation bias, where we seek out information that confirms our existing beliefs (and ignore or reject alternatives). That makes sense: we have to start with what we know.

So let’s start with the idea that the earth is a living organism.

What does it mean to say that the Earth is alive?

Arguments against the earth being a living organism begin with its makeup: at its core, it is just rock, minerals, and metals.  The Earth’s systems such as weather, geology, and ecosystems are the result of physical and chemical processes that follow the laws of nature and are not guided by any kind of consciousness or intent.  From this dead sort of mechanical perspective, life on its surface is the result of natural physical and chemical processes.

The perspective continues with the “definition” of life to require essential characteristics such as growth, reproduction, and the ability to respond to stimuli.  Some people also hedge the definition by including “intentionality” as a characteristic.  The argument asserts that the earth, at its core, is not living, so it can’t do any of these things, not even unconsciously. What is happening on its surface is merely the bubbling of chemical processes.

Yet we consider human organisms to be living, Continue reading “An argument for a living, conscious planet”

Planetary Consciousness

I ran across an interesting theory, while reading a James Rollins book (“Alter of Eden”), that artfully wove together fractals, the fact that all animals have strange magnetite crystals in the brain, and perspectives on what makes a human-animal bond so strong.  The theory, roughly stated, is that at one point in the movement of animals through developmental time, our brains shared a composite consciousness by means of a fractal web of these magnetite particles in our brains creating satellite-dish-type communications that formed a “single-mind” sort of approach to shared survival.

It is a fantastic thought, and one that fits in rather nicely with another theory: Noetics, which I ran across in the Dan Brown book, “The Lost Symbol.”  Roughly, that theory goes that the soul and thoughts have measurable substance.  Given laser-sharp focus, will to sustain or emotion to Continue reading “Planetary Consciousness”